Moroccan Student Jailed for Online Death Threat Against Activist Ahmed Assid: A Troubling Case of Incitement
Human rights activist Ahmed Assid has expressed deep concern over the seven-year prison sentence handed down to a Moroccan student for posting a death threat against him online. The threat, “This one should be slaughtered,” was made in a Facebook comment on a video where Assid discussed inheritance laws, a topic often sparking heated debate in Morocco.
While condemning the student’s actions, Assid views him as a victim of inflammatory rhetoric employed by certain preachers and politicians. These figures, Assid argues, often label those with differing views on sensitive topics like family law as enemies of Islam, intent on destroying Moroccan society. This kind of rhetoric, he believes, creates a climate of intolerance and can incite violence.
Assid’s concerns highlight a broader issue of online hate speech and its potential consequences. The case resonates with global trends of increasing online harassment and threats, particularly against activists and public figures. A 2022 report by the International Center for Journalists found that 73% of women journalists have experienced online violence. While this statistic focuses on journalists, it reflects a wider problem of online hostility that transcends professions. The rise of social media has created new avenues for both free expression and, unfortunately, for targeted harassment and incitement.
Assid points to the inadequacy of certain religious and political discourses in addressing the evolving Moroccan society. He suggests that, unable to engage constructively with societal changes, some figures resort to inflammatory rhetoric and public shaming of individuals, civil society organizations, political leaders, and intellectuals who hold different perspectives. This approach, he argues, undermines the responsible dialogue fostered by the Moroccan state, which has actively sought input from various stakeholders on issues like family law reform.
The student’s severe sentence underscores the seriousness with which Moroccan authorities are treating online threats. Assid himself has previously warned young Moroccans about the dangers of violent extremism. He notes that Moroccan security services now utilize advanced technology to monitor extremist views online, leading to prosecutions by the public prosecutor. This case serves as a stark reminder of the potential legal ramifications of online expressions, even seemingly impulsive comments.
This incident raises important questions about freedom of speech, online safety, and the responsibility of public figures in shaping public discourse. While freedom of expression is a fundamental right, it is not absolute and does not protect incitement to violence. Balancing these competing interests remains a complex challenge for societies worldwide. The case also highlights the need for media literacy and critical thinking skills to navigate the often-polarized online environment.
Further research into online hate speech legislation in Morocco and comparative studies with other countries could provide valuable context for understanding this case and its implications. Organizations like Article 19 and Human Rights Watch offer resources and analysis on freedom of expression and online censorship. Exploring these resources can offer a deeper understanding of the legal and ethical dimensions of this complex issue. The student’s sentencing, while addressing a specific threat, also serves as a cautionary tale about the power of words in the digital age and the importance of fostering respectful dialogue, even on contentious issues.
